Customer Impact / Cross-Cluster Anomaly
Identify shared infrastructure problems by correlating similar behavior across independent Qumulo clusters.
Unacknowledged
Risk score
56/ 100High
+24 vs. 24h ago
Status
High risk
Confidence: 72%
Estimated lead time
Observed now
Observed in current data
Risk score trend
Evidence
Correlated latencyqumulo
4 independent clusters show the same latency rise across East US 2
Indicators 1 + 3azure
Platform event and storage degradation share the same zone
How this risk score works
- What it is
- A 0–100 estimate of how likely Customer Impact (Cross-Cluster) are to cause customer impact soon. Higher means more signals are moving away from normal at the same time.
- How it is calculated
- Each signal is compared with its own baseline (same hour, last 14 days). The further it is above baseline, the more points it adds, up to a fixed weight per signal. The points add up to the score, capped at 100. Method: topology-based correlation + blast-radius calculation.
- This score
- Increased storage latency +18, Higher API error rate +12, Network RTT to storage +11, other signals +15 = 56 (High), +24 vs. 24h ago.
- 0–25 Normal26–50 Elevated51–75 High76–100 Critical
- What it tells you
- The risk is already visible in current data. Start with Increased storage latency, which adds the most points. Confidence 72% reflects how many expected data feeds reported.
Contributing signals
Score breakdown56 / 100
| Signal | Current | Baseline | Points | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increased storage latency | 4 clusters | 0 | +18 | high |
| Higher API error rate | 3 clusters | 0 | +12 | medium |
| Network RTT to storage | 4 clusters | 1 | +11 | medium |
| Read/write throttling | 3 clusters | 0 | +10 | medium |
| Cross-AZ packet loss | 2 clusters | 0 | +5 | low |
Affected resources (4)
| Resource | Type | Region / AZ | Current Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| rg-anq-prod-eus2-c0142 | Qumulo Cluster | East US 2 / 1 | 86 |
| rg-anq-prod-eus2-c0217 | Qumulo Cluster | East US 2 / 1 | 72 |
| rg-anq-prod-eus2-c0388 | Qumulo Cluster | East US 2 / 2 | 64 |
| rg-anq-prod-eus2-c0451 | Qumulo Cluster | East US 2 / 1 | 58 |
Affected clusters (4)
| Cluster | Resource group | Current Risk |
|---|---|---|
| ANQ-0142 · Media & Entertainment | rg-anq-prod-eus2-c0142 | 86 |
| ANQ-0217 · Life Sciences | rg-anq-prod-eus2-c0217 | 72 |
| ANQ-0388 · Retail & Distribution | rg-anq-prod-eus2-c0388 | 64 |
| ANQ-0451 · Manufacturing | rg-anq-prod-eus2-c0451 | 58 |
Recommended actions
- 1Investigate a possible shared dependency across East US 2 before handling these as separate customer tickets.
- 2Open a proactive case with Microsoft citing the correlated clusters.
- 3Prepare communication for the 4 exposed clusters if impact is confirmed.